COVID-19 Vaccination and Gaps in India.

INTRODUCTION: The important variables that influence how many people are vaccinated against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in India include vaccine skepticism, socioeconomic status, and multi-dimensional deprivation. Our preliminary research suggests that uncertainty about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine has a large and detrimental effect on immunization rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Crucial Subsets Survey (CSS) is performed daily on Facebook to recruit participants for cross-section surveys by academic institutions, the Delphi Research Center, and the University of Maryland's Joint Program in Survey Methodology. Facebook will notify a portion of its daily users to take a vote. CSS adds behavior, attitude toward policy and preventive measures, economic consequences, and critical indicators to official reporting data. RESULTS: It has been estimated that a 30% drop in vaccination coverage may be attributed to a 1% rise in vaccine skepticism. Similarly, higher rates of multidimensional poverty are associated with lower rates of COVID-19 vaccine coverage. When the multidimensional poverty index (MPI), or the percentage of persons living in extreme poverty, rises by one unit, immunization rates fall by around half. It suggests that higher rates of socioeconomic hardship have unfavorable effects on health outcomes like vaccination rates. We also showed that gender is a major factor in influencing how internet availability affects vaccination rates and hesitation. We discovered that male vaccination rates went up in tandem with male internet use. This might be because of the digital divide and India's reliance on digital technologies like the COVID Vaccine Intelligence Network (COWIN), AAROGYA SETU, and Imphal, India, to assign and register for COVID-19 vaccinations, while males have greater digital excess than females. While male internet access is significantly and positively correlated with coverage, female internet access is significantly and negatively correlated with coverage. Women are less likely to seek medical care and have more vaccination reluctance than men, both of which contribute to this trend. CONCLUSION: The government's strategy for disseminating information about the COVID-19 vaccination should prioritize reaching out to women. In order to recruit more women to vaccination clinics, it is important to raise public awareness about the need for immunization among women via the media and community outreach.

Assessment of Kidney Involvement in COVID-19 Patient.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Physicians need to be aware of the difficulties that SARS-CoV-2 infection brings to other regions of the body, such as the kidneys, even though the key emphasis is on pulmonary characteristics. The most frequent kidney complication among COVID-19 hospitalized patients is considered acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to describe overall different aspects of acute kidney injury (AKI) in COVID-19 patients admitted to JLNMCH during the COVID-19 pandemic and to determine the prevalence of AKI among COVID-19 hospitalized patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All adult patients (over the age of 18 years) who screened positive for COVID-19 in a swab specimen from areas of nasopharyngeal by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and then hospitalized were included in the study. Information was gathered on the patient's demographics, general medical history, and drugs prescribed. From past medical information, associated comorbidities and home pharmaceuticals were identified. We gathered hospitalization information, such as duration of stay in ICU, details about the application of mechanical ventilation, information regarding extracorporeal membrane aeration, details of the use of vasopressor administration, and baseline results of laboratory test along with baseline clinical information during 48 hours of hospitalization. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with no history of AKI requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 79.4%, while the percentage of patients with no history of AKI not requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 11.5%. The difference was relevant statistically (p<0.001). The percentage of patients with AKI of any stage requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 22.8%, while the percentage of patients with no history of AKI not requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 76.8%. The difference was relevant statistically (p<0.022). CONCLUSION: We discovered that AKI was a rather typical finding among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 had a poor prognosis if they developed AKI.

Effectiveness and Safety of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib for Pulmonary Fibrosis in COVID-19-Induced Severe Pneumonia: An Interventional Study.

Background After a diagnosis of two to five years, the survival length for pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is considered to be medium. The primary objective of PF treatment is to stabilize or minimize the pace of progression of the illness. The treatment of PF by nintedanib and pirfenidone was a breakthrough. In a group of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced PF patients, we examined the efficacy of pirfenidone and nintedanib. Methodology From May 2021 to April 2022, 5,000 patients receiving antifibrotic treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib (mean age of 78.3 ± 23.8) for PF were identified. Their clinical and functional information was retrospectively examined at zero, six, and twelve months of therapy. Results The average age of patients receiving nintedanib was greater than the average age of the pirfenidone group (p < 0.0001). Exertional dyspnea and dry cough, with no distinction between the two groups, were the most prevalent symptoms of the illness (p < 0.05). No significant changes between patients on pirfenidone and nintedanib were seen in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, total lung capacity, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide at zero or six months (p > 0.05). After one year, lung function measures were similar to the baseline in individuals treated with pirfenidone and nintedanib. This study highlights the appearance of both antifibrotic medicines as promising treatment options for functional stability in COVID-19-induced PF patients. Conclusions The patients affected by COVID-19 and undergoing fibrinolytic therapy may be well treated by any of the drugs with a significant improvement.

Assessment of Kidney Involvement in COVID-19 Patient

Background and aim: Physicians need to be aware of the difficulties that SARS-CoV-2 infection brings to other regions of the body, such as the kidneys, even though the key emphasis is on pulmonary characteristics. The most frequent kidney complication among COVID-19 hospitalized patients is considered acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to describe overall different aspects of acute kidney injury (AKI) in COVID-19 patients admitted to JLNMCH during the COVID-19 pandemic and to determine the prevalence of AKI among COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Methods and materials: All adult patients (over the age of 18 years) who screened positive for COVID-19 in a swab specimen from areas of nasopharyngeal by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and then hospitalized were included in the study. Information was gathered on the patient's demographics, general medical history, and drugs prescribed. From past medical information, associated comorbidities and home pharmaceuticals were identified. We gathered hospitalization information, such as duration of stay in ICU, details about the application of mechanical ventilation, information regarding extracorporeal membrane aeration, details of the use of vasopressor administration, and baseline results of laboratory test along with baseline clinical information during 48 hours of hospitalization. Results: The percentage of patients with no history of AKI requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 79.4%, while the percentage of patients with no history of AKI not requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 11.5%. The difference was relevant statistically (p<0.001). The percentage of patients with AKI of any stage requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 22.8%, while the percentage of patients with no history of AKI not requiring traumatic mechanical ventilation was 76.8%. The difference was relevant statistically (p<0.022). Conclusion: We discovered that AKI was a rather typical finding among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 had a poor prognosis if they developed AKI.

Study on Hydroxychloroquinine Sulfate Being Given to the Admitted COVID -19 Positive Patients at Institute of JLNMCH, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India.

Background As the global death toll from new coronavirus illness (COVID-19) rises, the scientific community and healthcare systems are under massive pressure to manage the outbreak and develop effective medical remedies. Meanwhile, desperation has pushed practitioners, scientists, and authorities to recommend and attempt medicines with little or no proof. Despite the lack of clear and unequivocal facts supporting its efficacy and safety, hydroxychloroquine-sulfate (HCQS) has recently received substantial public and political interest in treating and prophylaxis new infectious diseases COVID-19. Aim To analyze the impact of HCQS in COVID-19-positive patients admitted at tertiary level government-owned Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital (JLNMCH, Bhagalpur) Bihar. Methods Two hundred two RT-PCR-positive COVID-19 patients were included in this research. The study participants were randomly distributed into the intervention category and control category, each consisting of 101 study subjects. Study participants in the intervention category were administered hydroxychloroquine in 200 mg tablets. The control category was given placebo tablets that looked similar to tablets of hydroxychloroquine and were given in the same pattern. Chest X-ray PA view, 12 lead ECG, baseline hemogram including a concentration of CD4 cells, ratio between the concentration of CD8 cells and CD4 cells and concentration of CD8 cells, the concentration of C-reactive protein, RT PCR test of samples obtained from the oropharyngeal region and nasopharyngeal region nasopharyngeal for verification COVID-19 were done. These measurements were carried out in both the control and intervention categories at baseline and at the moment of obtaining a negative RT-PCR report. Results The confirmed cases of COVID-19 was 52.9% in the intervention category and 53.4% in the control category at the end of the administration of drugs. Symptoms related to COVID-19 were observed in 11.6% of subjects in the intervention category and 13.5% in the control category. Other new symptoms were observed in 16.8% of subjects in the intervention category and 14.5% of study subjects in the control category. One death was reported in the control category. Emergency hospitalization was required for one subject in the intervention category, while two subjects in the control category required emergency hospitalization. 12.4 days was the mean duration of recovery in the intervention category, while 13.6 days were the mean duration of recovery in the control category. The recovery duration and COVID-related symptoms were lesser in the intervention category than in the control category; however, the variation between the two categories was statistically non-significant (p˃0.01). Conclusion According to this research, no statistically significant difference was noticed in COVID-19 incidence between the control category and intervention category, showing that hydroxychloroquine sulfate cannot be utilized as the main curative agent in the treatment of COVID-19. However, there was a reduction in recovery days and symptoms related to COVID-19 in study subjects administered with HCQS.